Designing Training That People Choose to Take

There’s a quiet moment that happens every day inside organizations, and it rarely shows up in dashboards or reports. An employee opens the learning platform. At the top sits a mandatory course — highlighted, deadline attached. Below it are optional programs: leadership basics, communication skills, a new tool walkthrough. The choice is made almost instantly. The mandatory course is clicked, often muted, sometimes skipped through. The optional learning? Left untouched.

This moment reveals an uncomfortable truth about corporate learning: most training survives because it is enforced, not because it is valued. Outside of work, people choose to learn constantly — watching explainer videos, following creators, picking up new tools, and playing games that teach complex systems without instructions, reminders, or nudges. The problem isn’t that employees don’t want to learn. The problem is that most learning is not designed to be chosen.

Why Mandatory Learning Became the Default

Corporate learning has historically been built around control. Compliance, coverage, and consistency were the priorities. The assumption was simple: if learning is important, it must be mandatory.

And for some topics — safety, regulation, risk — that will always remain true.

But over time, this compliance-first mindset spread to everything else. Skill building, leadership development, product knowledge, even behavioral training began to look the same: long courses, fixed paths, uniform experiences.

The result? Learning became something to finish, not something to engage with.

Completion rates went up. Capability didn’t.

When learning is imposed, learners adapt their behavior accordingly. They do the minimum. They optimize for speed, not understanding. They focus on passing, not practicing.

Designing learning that people choose to take requires a fundamental shift — from asking “How do we ensure completion?” to asking “Why would someone willingly come back to this?”

Choice Begins With Relevance, Not Motivation

One of the biggest misconceptions in L&D is that engagement is a motivation problem. It isn’t — it’s a relevance problem. Before any learner truly engages, they subconsciously ask one simple question: “How does this help me right now?” If the answer isn’t immediately clear, the brain disengages. No amount of gamification, points, or reminders can compensate for learning that feels irrelevant.

• Learning that people choose to take is grounded in real moments:

• A conversation they’re struggling with

• A decision they keep getting wrong

• A task that feels harder than it should

• A skill gap they’re aware of but don’t know how to fix

When learning mirrors lived experience, curiosity replaces resistance. This is where microlearning engagement becomes powerful — not because the content is short, but because it is situational. Learners don’t feel like they are entering a course; they feel like they are solving a problem. At QuoDeck, programs built around real job scenarios consistently outperform topic-based courses. Learners don’t log in because they were told to — they log in because the learning feels useful.

Autonomy Changes the Relationship With Learning

Another invisible barrier to voluntary learning is lack of control. Most corporate training experiences remove autonomy entirely — everyone starts at the same point, follows the same path, and completes the same modules in the same order. This design assumes learners are passive recipients. But adults aren’t wired that way.

The moment learners are given choice — choice of pace, path, and depth — something changes. Learning stops feeling like an instruction and starts feeling like a resource. Designing learning that people choose to take means restoring agency:

• Let learners skip what they already know

• Offer multiple ways to reach the same outcome

• Allow exploration without penalty

• Give learners control over sequencing

Games, streaming platforms, and modern digital products thrive on this principle because they trust users to navigate their own journey. When learning does the same, engagement no longer needs enforcement.

Progress Is What Keeps People Coming Back

People don’t return to experiences because they are told to. They return because they feel progress. One of the biggest failures of traditional training is that effort is invisible — learners spend time, but they don’t see growth. Modules blur together, and completion feels hollow. In contrast, experiences people choose to return to make progress unmistakable.

Progress doesn’t mean certificates. It means:

“I’m better at this than I was yesterday” “I handled that scenario differently” “I unlocked something because I improved” “I can do something now that I couldn’t before”

This is why progress mechanics matter — not as decoration, but as motivation. When learning visibly rewards growth through levels, milestones, scenarios, or capability markers, learners develop momentum. They don’t want to lose it. This is where gamified learning experiences quietly outperform traditional ones — not because they are playful, but because they respect how humans stay motivated.

Feedback Turns Learning Into a Dialogue

Another reason people avoid optional training is silence. Learners complete something and hear nothing back — no confirmation, no guidance, and no sense of direction. Learning that people choose to take behaves differently. It responds.

Feedback transforms learning from a broadcast into a conversation. It tells learners:

• what worked

• what didn’t

• why it mattered

• what to try next

When feedback is immediate and meaningful, learners feel supported rather than judged. They experiment more and stay longer. This becomes especially powerful in scenario-based learning, where decisions unfold into consequences. Learners aren’t just told what was right or wrong — they experience the outcome.

At QuoDeck, feedback loops are central to keeping learners engaged beyond the first interaction. When learners feel the system is “paying attention,” they return.

People Choose Learning When They Feel They Belong

Learning is not just cognitive — it’s social. People are far more likely to engage with experiences that signal identity and shared progress:

• “People like me are doing this”

• “My team is progressing”

• “This is part of how we grow here”

Brand campaigns understand this deeply. They don’t just sell products; they create belonging. Learning can do the same. When learners see peers engaging, teams progressing, and shared milestones being achieved, learning becomes part of culture rather than a task on a list.

This doesn’t require aggressive competition. It requires visibility, recognition, and shared movement. And people always return to places where they feel they belong.

Designing for Choice Is the Real Measure of Success

Completion rates tell you who had to finish. Voluntary participation tells you who wanted to.

As work becomes more dynamic and skills become increasingly perishable, learning cannot rely on mandates alone. The most effective learning ecosystems are the ones learners:

• return to without reminders

• explore beyond requirements

• recommend to others

• associate with personal growth

Designing learning that people choose to take is not about making learning easier — it’s about making it worth choosing. It requires a shift:

• from content delivery to experience design

• from enforcement to engagement

• from coverage to capability

• from obligation to ownership

Organizations that embrace this shift won’t struggle with engagement or chase completion. Learning will simply become part of how people work and grow.

Conlcusion

The future of workplace learning will not be measured by completion rates or compliance metrics, but by whether people choose to engage with it on their own. When learning is relevant, gives learners autonomy, provides meaningful feedback, and creates a sense of belonging, it stops feeling like an obligation and starts feeling like a genuine tool for growth. Designing learning that people choose to take requires a shift from control to trust, from enforcement to experience, and from coverage to capability — and organizations that make this shift won’t need reminders or mandates, because learning will naturally become part of how people work, improve, and move forward.

Enjoyed this insight? Subscribe for more practical, impactful L&D strategies.